Nathalie is already Fusion Reginal Director for Belgium and has been awarded for all her delivered work.
The article in Oracle Magazine:

Those are big improvements for as well developers, as administrators and especially for troubleshooting.
I went to the presentation of Lonneke and Ronald regarding AquaLogic vs. Oracle, which was a really great presentation with a good overview and an objective comparison of both environments.
This mix session was 1 of the winning sessions for Oracle Open World and it's a hot topic nowadays of course.
What were the tools that were compared:
One of the first tips Lonneke has discussed was how to govern such a SOA Project using waterfall approach or not. She mentioned that bottom-up and top-down should be combined instead of sticking with one of both methodologies because when choosing one you would either have a load of services that weren't used, or a combined service with not enough granularity.
You need to think about an Enterprise Model, once you've defined that model, the high level architecture, you can start going into the business processes itself and the description of all the artefacts.
Trying to rush your business process analysis without a firm understanding of the enterprise model will spare you a lot of rework and of course a firm approach for as well the business as it department.
The comparison which was made by them, is put in their presentation slides, which will be made available by Oracle.
The main points I've written down (which maybe aren't all documented in the presentation).
Enterprise Architecture:
Composite Services:
I would really like to thank Ronald and Lonneke for the great presentation and the different demo's they provided during the session. I'm sure this session was of great value for many customers struggling with the very hot topic right now: what to choose ;o)